time Microsoft filed they patent, had they wanted to do any searching:
Publ.
Date. Number Title
----- --------- ---------------------------------------------------------
1993 5,199,077 Wordspotting for voice editing and indexing
2004 6,829,582 Controlled access to audio signals based on objectionable
audio content detected via sound recognition
2000 6,166,780 Automated language filter
1999 5,870,708 Method of and apparatus for scanning for and replacing
words on video cassettes
1994 5,369,440 System and method for automatically controlling the audio
output of a television
So let's look at this prior art, which neither Microsoft nor the PTO did, to see how crappy Microsoft's patent is.
The first patent, dating back to 1993 (eleven years before Microsoft filed) is a foundational patent on pattern recognition systems (in this case, Hidden Markov Models) to learn to recognize and delete segments of speech, which includes questionable segments of speech that are being broadcasted:
_________________________________________________________________
United States Patent 5,199,077
Wordspotting for voice editing and indexing
Abstract
A technique for wordspotting based on hidden Markov models (HMM's).
The technique allows a speaker to specify keywords dynamically and to
train the associated HMM's via a single repetition of a keyword.
Non-keyword speech is modeled using an HMM trained from a prerecorded
sample of continuous speech. The wordspotter is intended for
interactive applications, such as the editing of voice mail or
mixed-media documents, and for keyword indexing in single-speaker
audio or video recordings.
From the SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION:
An important application for the wordspotting system of the invention
is not only indexing of recorded speech, but especially for
interactive voice editing of recorded speech, such as voice mail,
dictation, or audio documentation. Wordspotting can be employed by the
user to enable editing operations by locating specific words in the
recorded speech for deletion, substitution, or insertion. It will also
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
enable efficient and automatic means of indexing into long audio
documents. The system, while restricted to a single speaker, or pairs
of speakers is not restricted in vocabulary size.
_________________________________________________________________
One application of this patent is to use the Hidden Markov Models on recorded speech THAT IS BROADCASTED, using the detections to delete specific words, i.e., Microsoft's patent. Almost complete anticipation, especially when obviously combined with the following patent:
_________________________________________________________________
United States Patent 5,369,440
System and method for automatically controlling the audio output of a
television
Abstract
A system and method for automatically controlling the audio output
from a television so as to avoid listening to undesired material
includes a microphone for converting the audio output from the
television into audio signals, an audio amplifier for amplifying the
audio signals from the microphone, a waveform pattern comparator, a
waveform digitizer and recorder, a speech recognition unit, an
external device controller, a computer and an input/output device. In
setting up the system for subsequent use, waveform patterns of audio
signals corresponding to material being outputted from the television
which the listener considers undesirable are digitized by the waveform
digitizer and recorder and then stored in the waveform pattern
comparator. In addition, digital signals corresponding to key words in
undesired material are entered into the computer through the
input/output device and then transferred from the computer to the
speech recognition unit. Once the system has been loaded with the
undesired material, waveform pattern comparator continually digitizes
and compares the audio signal output from the audio amplifier with the
stored data. At the same time, the speech recognition unit compares
the audio signal output with the stored key words. When the undesired
material is detected an indicator signal is sent to the external
device controller which outputs a control signal which is applied to
the television to make some adjustment to either the sound or the
channel to avoid listening to the undesired material.
_________________________________________________________________
So two patents, published in 1993 and 1994, TEN YEARS BEFORE MICROSOFT FILED THEIR PIECE OF CRAP, completely anticipate Microsoft's supposed invention. Just to have fun, I found three more patents, also so much on point to be powerful prior art.
_________________________________________________________________
United States Patent 6,166,780
Automated language filter
Abstract
A method and apparatus for analyzing the closed captioned aspect of a
video signal for specific undesirable words or phrases and then muting
the audio portion of those words or phrases while not affecting the
video portion therein while simultaneously modifying the closed
captioned signal in order to display only acceptable words or phrases.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
United States Patent 6,829,582
Controlled access to audio signals based on objectionable audio
content detected via sound recognition
Abstract
An apparatus, program product, and method restrict access to
objectionable audio content in an audio or audio/video transmission
using sound recognition. Sound recognition may be performed, for
example, to detect and control access to objectionable non-spoken
audio content, e.g., by detecting violent sounds such as screams,
explosions, gun shots, sirens, punches, kicks and/or other non-spoken
content such as sexually-suggestive sounds. In addition, occurrences
of objectionable audio content detected in an audio transmission may
be tracked so that access to the audio transmission may be controlled
responsive to the identification of multiple occurrences of
objectionable audio content. Furthermore, access control over detected
objectionable audio content in an audio transmission may result in
inhibition of access to a program associated with the audio
transmission.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
United States Patent 5,870,708
Method of and apparatus for scanning for and replacing words on video
cassettes
Abstract
A scanning apparatus for scanning a video recording for objectionable
content is disclosed that includes an audio processor for analyzing
the recording and recognizing the objectionable audio, and audio
control gate for manipulating the objectionable audio. The scanning
apparatus also includes an amplifier that amplifies the signal and
converters to convert the signal from analog to digital format prior
to analysis and digital to analog format after analysis. The method of
scanning the video recording for objectionable content includes the
steps of analyzing the recording and manipulating the recording. The
method first includes the steps of amplifying the recording signal,
separating the audio portion of the recording from the composite
recording, digitizing the portions of the recording, and storing the
composite portion of the recording in a loop while analysis is
performed on the audio portion of the recording.
_________________________________________________________________
So five patents I found in 15 minutes completely invalidate Microsoft's crappily issued patent. And this doesn't rely on even more patents, and even much more non-patent prior art that is available, had anyone bother to do any searching (apparently a firable offense at Microsoft).
15 minutes neither Microsoft nor the PTO spent doing a similar search. Because to big companies like Microsoft, and big liars like Jon Dudas, patent quality is still a big freaking joke. So when con artists like IBM lie about the need for public peer review of patents, while remaining silent about the incompetence of PTO management with regards to prior art
handling, it is just con artists cheating. And when liars like Jon Dudas chandleristically whine that the PTO needs more prior art, it is a big freaking lie because the PTO still is unable to make use of all of the patent prior art it has complete access to, let alone non-patent prior
art. All of these people are liars, especially since it takes longer for them to write their liars about prior art that it does for me to find the prior art.
==========
Automatic censorship of audio data for broadcast
Microsoft
U.S. Patent 7,437,290
1. A method for automatically censoring audio data, comprising the
steps of:
(a) automatically processing the audio data to detect any undesired
speech that may be included therein, by comparison to undesired
speech data, by performing the following steps; comparing words in
the audio data against words comprising the undesired speech, to
identify potential matches; dynamically varying a probability
threshold dependent upon at least one criterion; and based upon a
probability of a potential match and the probability threshold,
determining whether any undesired speech is included in the audio
data;
(b) for each occurrence of undesired speech that is automatically
detected, altering the undesired speech detected in the audio data,
producing censored audio data in which the undesired speech is
substantially no longer perceivable by a listening audience; and
(c) dynamically adjusting the probability threshold based upon a
frequency with which undesired speech by a specific speaker is
detected in the audio data, so that as the occurrences of undesired
speech that are detected increase, the probability threshold is
reduced
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Microsoft gets awarded yet another excrement patent
Case in point - one of the revolting pieces of fecal patents just issued recently to Microsoft. It demonstrates yet again the contempt of large companies do to any prior art searching, the love of large companies to flood the PTO with crap applications to choke the system while whining
about others who do the same [now known as Chandlerism], and once again, it demonstrates the PTO'S COMPLETE AND TOTAL MISMANAGEMENT OF PRIOR ART SEARCHING AND RESOURCES. When Jon Dudas told Congress that most, if not all, measures of quality at the PTO are their highest in 25 years, he deliberately LIED to Congress. Whoever is paying Dudas to wreck the PTO is getting their monies worth.
The patent. The USPTO belched/oozed/barfed out U.S. patent 7,437,290 to Microsoft:
Automatic censorship of audio data for broadcast
U.S. Patent 7,437,290
MICROSOFT (filed October 2004, issued October 2008)
Despicable claim language aside, this patent is a method for detecting undesired speech in broadcasts, censoring (deleting, bleeping) the undeisred speech and updating probability tables for the presence of the recognized speech. COMPLETELY UNINNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY. The claim is attached below.
So how much tremendous amounts of prior art, with Bill Gates' billions to sustain decent prior art searching (NOT - a lesson well learned by its stepchild Intellectual Ventures) - how much prior art is associated with this patent? NEXT TO FREAKING NOTHING. The patent cites two prior patents, and one non-patent prior art published too late:
7,139,031 Automated language filter for TV receiver
6,337,947 Method and apparatus for customized editing of
video and/or audio signals
Seide et al, "Vocabulary-Independent Search in Spontaneous Speech",
IEEE International Conference on ASSP, May 2004
Such pathetic prior art submissions should a priori be automatic proof of intent to deceive the Patent Office. Just how pathetic is this patent? Once again, let me do a 15-minute-Jon-Dudas-High-Quality-Patent-Bust. Thebust relies on five patents that were published by the time the examinershould have been doing ANY searching, four of which were published at the
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
So then why not send this information to the PTO to trigger a RE-EXAMINATION? At the very least, you can have this prior art put in the PTO file for that patent.
Remember, ANY PERSON, at ANY TIME may submit prior art in the form of PRINTED PATENTS OR PUBLICATIONS which that person believes has a bearing on patentability. [This is free]. All you need to do is submit the information and serve a copy of the prior art on the patent owner.
If you feel strongly about it, why not take a few minutes and act upon it? There is no risk to you for doing so.
good advice, thank you
Post a Comment