Analysis of US Patent application 20080926, Electric iron + MP3 player, and US Patent Application 20040085337, Video enhanced grave marker.
I recently came across a patent application that at first glance seems completely obvious to the extent that it could be unethical for the lawyer involved to have accepted money to file the application.
The application is 2007/218960, "Combined electric iron and audio device", and that's pretty much the invention - sticking something like an MP3 player inside the housing of an iron.  Abstract and claims below.  Claim 1 attempts to proclaim:
  1.  A  combined iron and audio device, comprising:
      an electric iron having a housing;
      an audio device configured into the housing;
      a control system for the audio device, said control system
          being configured to operably control said audio device;
      and a power source to power the audio device.
First question - where's the new useful synergy between the iron and the audio device, other than one of X being housed in Y?  There isn't any, and most of the submitted claims deal with the functionality of the audio device, and not with any "functional" (whatever that means - the PTO
continues to illegally refuse to define the term despite using it in its examination guidelines and for rejections) interaction between the iron and the audio device.
What might a functional interaction be?  For example, "... wherein the output of the audio device is connected to the heating element of the electric iron", that is, instead of the iron providing a steady level of heat, the iron's heat output is modulated by whatever music is playing.
Admittedly, that's idiotic as well, but at least its functional (a more practical version of this is Apple's upcoming patent application for a vibrator-shaped iPod :-).
But as is, I see no interaction, in particular, no new useful result.  The iron still irons, the audio device still audios - the whole does not exceed the sum of its parts - there is nothing greater than expected.  I argue the invention, as so claimed, flunks paragraph 101 of the US Patent law.
One claim does suggest some interaction:
  10.  The combined iron and audio device of claim 1, in which the power
  source  comprises  a  power converting circuit, the circuit converting
  the  electrical power used by the iron into a form suitable for use in
  the audio device.
but then this seems completely obvious to any consumer electronics engineer - tapping a main unit's power supply to supply a secondary unit - done all the time in personal computers, with peripherals drawing power from the main power supply.  So I argue this claims flunks 103.  And if I search around, I suspect I can find some 102 prior art.  This patent application, if it manages to somehow issue, will never be successfully asserted against anyone.  Making it a waste of time and money to file.
And I argue that these claims so blatantly fail 101 and 103 that the lawyer should have refused to file the patent application on the inventor's behalf.  The inventor is just wasting his money, and this application is yet one more that clogs the system to the detriment of all (though the big
companies clog the system with orders larger amounts of crap applications). I argue there are times when lawyers should refuse to file crap, explaining why to the inventor (starting with "What's the new useful result here?").
Or not.  What do you think?
And this is not an isolated example.  An earlier filed patent application swaps out the iron, and swaps in a tombstone:
  United States Patent Application      20040085337
  Video enhanced grave marker
  I claim:
  1.  A tombstone for communicating audio and visual data related to the
  deceased from the tombstone to a user, the tombstone comprising:
  an indicia bearing and viewing portion;
  a visual display;
  an audio transmitter for communicating sound waves to a user;
  data related to the deceased, the data comprising audio and visual
      images of the deceased, the data stored within storage media;
and
  means for reproducing the audio and visual images of the deceased
      from the data related to the deceased utilizing one or more players,
      readers or drivers for the one or more of the storage media.
Again, what's the new useful result achieved by the audio device being
embedded into the tombstone?  Besides, there is an old episode of "Star
Trek" which has such a device, I think, an audiovisual projection of
some dead person is triggered when the Star Trek crew walked by.
  United States Patent Application      20070218960
  Combined electric iron and audio device
                                 Abstract
  A  combined iron and audio device is described, having an audio device
  incorporated  into  the  housing of an electric iron. The audio device
  can  be  any  audio  playing  device (e.g., an AM/FM radio receiver, a
  satellite  radio receiver, a radio, cassette player, USB audio player,
  and  an  MP3  player,  etc.).  The controls of the audio device may be
  located on one of the exposed surfaces of the housing and/or the audio
  device may be controlled by a wireless remote controller.
    _________________________________________________________________
  Inventors: Bernardino; Noel Nunez; (Bacolod City, PH)
  Correspondence Name and Address:
             BAY AREA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP, LLC
             PO BOX 210459, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121-0459
    _________________________________________________________________
                                  Claims
    _________________________________________________________________
  1.  A  combined  iron  and  audio device, comprising:
      an electric iron having a housing;
      an audio device configured into the housing;
      a control system for the audio device, said control system
          being configured to operably control said audio device;
      and a power source to power the audio device.
  2.  The  combined iron and audio device of claim 1, in which the audio
  device  is  selected  from  the  group  consisting  of  an AM/FM radio
  receiver,  a satellite radio receiver, a radio, a cassette player, USB
  audio player and an MP3 player.
  3. The combined iron and audio device of claim 1, in which the control
  system  comprises controls, which controls include a volume control, a
  on/off control, a tuning control, or a play/stop control.
  4.  The  combined  iron and audio device of claim 3, in which at least
  one control of the controls is disposed in or on an exposed surface of
  the housing.
  5. The combined iron and audio device of claim 1, in which the control
  system   comprises  wireless  remote  control  receiver  operable  for
  receiving  control  commands  from  a  corresponding  wireless  remote
  control transmitter.
  6.  The  combined iron and audio device of claim 1, further comprising
  means  for  protecting  the  audio  device and all its components from
  water damage.
  7. The combined iron and audio device of claim 1, further comprising a
  jack to plug in headphones and wireless headphones.
  8.  The  combined iron and audio device of claim 1, in which the power
  source is a battery.
  9. The combined iron and audio device of claim 8, further comprising a
  battery  compartment  operable  for  safely  holding  the  battery  in
  cooperation with the housing.
  10.  The combined iron and audio device of claim 1, in which the power
  source  comprises  a  power converting circuit, the circuit converting
  the  electrical power used by the iron into a form suitable for use in
  the audio device.
  11.  The combined iron and audio device of claim 1, in which the audio
  device is located in the back side of the iron housing.
  12.  The combined iron and audio device of claim 1, further comprising
  an  audio  output  unit  that  is  configured  to receive output audio
  signals  from said audio device, said audio output unit being operable
  to  communicate  to  a  user  audio  signals based on the output audio
  signals.
  13.  The  combined  iron  and  audio device of claim 12, in which said
  audio  output  unit is a speaker configured into the housing such that
  the audio output of the speaker can be made audible to the user.
  14.  The  combined  iron  and  audio device of claim 12, in which said
  audio output unit is a wireless speaker configured such that the audio
  output of the wireless speaker can be made audible to the user.
  15.  The  combined  iron  and  audio  device  of claim 1, in which the
  control  system  is configured to control the audio device in response
  to usage of the iron.
  16.  A  combined  iron  and audio device, comprising: an electric iron
  having  a  housing;  means  for  configuring  an audio device into the
  housing;  means  for  controlling  said  audio  device;  and means for
  powering the audio device.      
 
