Wednesday, January 30, 2008
WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PERFUME AND COLOGNE?
officially:
Perfume - is 25% or more of fragrant oils
Eau de Parfum - is 15% to 18% fragrant oils
Eau de Toilette - is 10% fragrant oils
Eau de Cologne - is 5% to 8% fragrant oils
Aftershave - is 3% fragrant oils
NEW BOOK: ALEX GRAHAM BELL STOLE IDEA FOR TELEPHONE
Newswires report that a new book has been published, "The Telephone Gambit:
Chasing Alexander Graham Bell's Secret" by Seth Shulman, in which Shulman
attempts to prove that Bell stole the key idea for his telephone. Shulman
argues that up until the year 1876, Bell was unable to figure
out how to transmit sound electromagnetically over a wire, as evidenced
by reports of failure in his laboratory notebooks. Then, after a 12-day
gap in 1876, when Bell went to Washington to discuss patent issues at the
Patent Office - Bell began developing a new mechanism for voice
transmission, which proved to be successful. Did Bell get a look at his competitor's
patents, the patents of Elisha Gray? Shulman argues yes, by comparing the
diagrams Bell made of his new transmitter to diagrams in Gray's earlier
patent applications. Shulman argues the two sets of diagrams are substantially similar
to conclude that Bell stole his key idea from Gray.
Of course, nowadays, thanks to the security morons
in USPTO management (no one in PTO management has any real experience
with national security), all you have to do to steal some important new
piece of technology is to find the name of the tele-working examiner who is
handling the technology, easily break into his house one night when he is
gone, and quickly make copies of technology nowhere else disclosed.
Labels:
intellectual property,
law,
patents,
recommended reading,
science,
technology
RIAA: PERSONAL COPYING IS ILLEGAL
The RIAA has exponentially insane passion for
defending its members' copyright interests.
The brief is at: www. ilrweb.com/
defending its members' copyright interests.
"In an Arizona case against a defendant who has no legal
representation, Atlantic v. Howell, the RIAA is now arguing -
contrary to its lawyers' statements to the United States Supreme
Court in 2005 MGM v. Grokster - that the defendant's ripping of
personal MP3 copies onto his computer is a copyright infringement.
At page 15 of its brief (PDF) it states the following: 'It is
undisputed that Defendant possessed unauthorized copies... Virtually
all of the sound recordings... are in the ".mp3" format for his and
his wife's use... Once Defendant converted Plaintiffs' recordings
into the compressed .mp3 format and they are in his shared folder,
they are no longer the authorized copies..."
representation, Atlantic v. Howell, the RIAA is now arguing -
contrary to its lawyers' statements to the United States Supreme
Court in 2005 MGM v. Grokster - that the defendant's ripping of
personal MP3 copies onto his computer is a copyright infringement.
At page 15 of its brief (PDF) it states the following: 'It is
undisputed that Defendant possessed unauthorized copies... Virtually
all of the sound recordings... are in the ".mp3" format for his and
his wife's use... Once Defendant converted Plaintiffs' recordings
into the compressed .mp3 format and they are in his shared folder,
they are no longer the authorized copies..."
The brief is at: www. ilrweb.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)